Straumann® Ceramic Implant Systems 

Outstanding aesthetics results.
Healthy peri-implant conditions.

Buy now
Contact us

As the global standard in implant and esthetic dentistry, Straumann is strongly committed to the further development of ceramic technologies. The Straumann® Ceramic Implant Systems portfolio combines over 30 years of R&D and clinical expertise thanks to proprietary technologies available with the PURE system.

Aiming at providing outstanding esthetic results, both systems offer the flexibility expected in modern dentistry for digital and traditional workflows while giving dentists the trust they look for when treating their patients.

Outstanding esthetics

High-end esthetic results, favorable soft tissue management.1,2
100 % ceramic bone level implant system.
Metal-free implants and clinically proven ZLA surface.6-8
Complete choice

Flexible treatment protocols, digital pre-operative implant planning and guided surgery.
Implant available in various diameters, including reduced 3.3mm.
Trust

100% proof tested5.

The Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant System

Discover natural PURE white. Love your smile.

Buy now
Watch tutorial

Nothing is more winning than a light-hearted and happy smile. With the PURE Ceramic Implant System even very demanding patients can smile with confidence. Without compromising on esthetics, reliability and the most natural choice of material. The Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant System is the result of more than 12 years of relentless research and development until the ceramic implant complied with our premium quality standards. It combines Swiss quality, precision, strength and clinical success in an innovative solution that helps you to meet the needs of your patients.

Looking for additional information? You'll find them in the Download Center.

Esthetics

High-end esthetic results, favorable soft tissue management.1,2
Quality

High-performance zirconia ceramic, 100% proof tested.5,6,9
Surface

ZLA® surface with revolutionary osseointegration features.
Flexibility

Flexible treatment protocols, digital pre-operative implant planning.
Innovation

A new system that helps you expand your patient pool.10
Metal-free

A metal-free alternative to titanium implants.
Focus Area

Esthetic restorations: Let your patients enjoy life with a beautiful smile – read more.
Straumann® Lifetime Guarantee

For your peace of mind - read more.

Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant Monotype

More than PURE esthetics. The natural-looking and metal-free solution.

Buy now
Contact us

The Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant Monotype has a monotype design based on the proven features of the Straumann® Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant and the Straumann® Bone Level Implant line.  As an addition to the standard 4.1 mm version, the 3.3 mm diameter-reduced variety helps to overcome the clinical requirements of specific situations, especially in the anterior region.

Looking for additional information? You'll find them in the Download Center.

Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant

More than PURE esthetics. The natural-looking and flexible two-piece solution.

Buy now
Learn more

The Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant inner connection together with the respective Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant abutments combines reliable Straumann® performance with highly PURE esthetic results.

Learn more

Looking for additional information? You'll find them in the Download Center.

Featured stories on youTooth

Contact us

Data usage agreement*

Read our privacy notice.

Please retype the code above

Downloads

Documents

Videos & Animations

Scientific evidence

View selected scientific literature

Catalogs

References

1 Kajiwara N, Masaki C, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Nakamoto T, Hosokawa R (2015). Soft tissue biological response to zirconia and metal implant abutments compared with natural tooth: microcirculation monitoring as a novel bioindicator. Implant Dent 24(1):37-41.
2 Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 May-Jun;17(3):285-90.
3 Liñares A, Grize L, Muñoz F, Pippenger BE, Dard M, Domken O, Blanco-Carrión J. Histological assessment of hard and soft tissues surrounding a novel ceramic implant: a pilot study in the minipig. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Jun;43(6):538-46.
4 Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Gehrke P, Piattelli A. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontol. 2006 Jan;77(1):73-80.
5 Institut Straumann AG, Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implants: A 100 % proof test ensures reliable implant strength. 03/14 490.028/en/B/001. www.straumann.com
6 Bormann KH, Gellrich NC, Kniha H, Dard M, Wieland M, Gahlert M. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02291.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
7 Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Mar;23(3):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02157.x.
8 Gahlert M, Röhling S, Wieland M, Eichhorn S, Küchenhoff H, Kniha H A comparison study of the osseointegra¬tion of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Dec;12(4):297-305. Doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00168.x
9 Bormann KH, Gellrich NC, Kniha H, Schild S, Weingart D, Gahlert M. A Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of Zirconium Dioxide Dental Implants in Single Tooth Gaps in the Maxilla and Mandible: 3-Year Results. Publication in preparation 2017.
10 Roehling S, Engelhardt-Woelfler H, Gahlert M. Full ceramic implants as an alternative to titanium? A demographic evaluation in Switzerland and Germany. Publication in preparation 2017.
11 Schlömer G et al. Zirconium dioxide implants: An alternative to titanium? A clinical assessment MED 2009; 01/09: 1
12 Mellinghoff J, Cacaci C, Detsch F Einteilige Keramikimplantate Eine Longitudinalstudie über zwei Jahre Beobachtungsdauer. Implantologie 23(1):89-100
13 Cumulated survival rate derived from Z-systems complaint statistics
14 Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos GG, Andreana S. Osseointegration of zirconia im-plants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):352-8. 
15 Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S13-20.
16 Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1403-17.
17 Roehling S, Schlegel KA, Woelfler H, Gahlert M. Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:135-153
18 Kniha K, Schlegel KA, Kniha H, Modabber A, Hölzle F, Kniha K Evaluation of peri-implant bone levels and soft tissue dimensions around zirconia implants-a three-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;47(4):492-498 connection implants using different torque values: an in vitro study. Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):175-9.